Sounds good. The structure here is a first draft, but should definitely be structured better, with a firmer logic behind it. In addition, we'd need some moderators that keep an eye on the different topics floating around

I’m not talki community moderation or how to manage threads on talk.
I’m talking put some brain and full planning into all our comms platforms, along with guidelines for what to use when.

I’m of the opinion we do it once and then leave it alone for the next 2 years before adapting anything or adding anything major to the ecosystem.

Is patchwork, and it shows.

Good point. There has not been concrete action on the structure of the comms channels vis a vis facebook, google docs, or a potential wiki. There also is no comms team yet. Might be a good point to push forward and structure it all.

As a backdrop, the dreamed-up complete tech setup is as follows:
- talk for all communication
- dreams links into talk
- "Realities" (in development) to link into dreams and talk (probably not for 2019)

and email, and docs, and the mail server, and a central knowledge base for core processes, and mail campaigns, and website, and sub websites, facebook, storage, hosting etc. and guidelines for usage.

it's short sighted of us to just leap on a loomio instance and think it's solving our problems. it's now just added to our service landscape patchwork

yes, I agree. Since there is no communication team and we always had issues with getting committed ppl on board to fulfill that role, how do you suggest we tackle this?

Guys I’m gonna call it for Wednesday 6th

Hi guys, how about a location?

Happy to have it here?

Here is at your place or in talk? ;)