The Bear Necessities and Honey. How do we encourage infrastructure and community support program funding.
With radical decentralisation and the introduction of the dreams platform, a small dilemma could occur. What happens if 300 bio-glitter stations get funded but nobody applies for the projects of power, Wanderers or gate?
Should we have a biased Dreams platform to support/encourage the introduction/improvement of necessary and highly loved projects (i.e power, greeters, toilets, gate, Wanderers, first aid, security, welfare)?
If yes then how? And how do we draw the boundary between infrastructure/culturally significant and our wonderful decidant dreams?
Should larger and more ambitious Dreams be given some statistical advantage to offset the tendency of past burns for participants to "spray and pray" their votes/tokens broadly over smaller projects? (This starves the bigger, harder to fund dreams)
If so how should that manifest?
Henrik 馃 Fri 15 Feb 2019 4:28PM
thanks for getting onboard =)
those projects need to be funded outside the dream process
for what reason? we could just display them on Dreams and allocate their minimum funding right away (the Robot Ministry would take care of that).
that way people will see that it's definitely happening (and how it's happening) and have the opportunity to help those project to get to their inception goal
Henrik 馃 Thu 7 Feb 2019 5:49PM
I think this is rather complicated. Despite the fact that this would require some technical extension of the current dreams platform, which doesn't make this impossible, but a lot more complicated.
Alex Kaos 路 Fri 15 Feb 2019 4:52PM
I agree. This seems to be the simplest solution. Simple is our friend. Simple makes beautiful complexity, complicatedness comes out ugly :p