The Bear Necessities and Honey. How do we encourage infrastructure and community support program funding.
With radical decentralisation and the introduction of the dreams platform, a small dilemma could occur. What happens if 300 bio-glitter stations get funded but nobody applies for the projects of power, Wanderers or gate?
Should we have a biased Dreams platform to support/encourage the introduction/improvement of necessary and highly loved projects (i.e power, greeters, toilets, gate, Wanderers, first aid, security, welfare)?
If yes then how? And how do we draw the boundary between infrastructure/culturally significant and our wonderful decidant dreams?
Should larger and more ambitious Dreams be given some statistical advantage to offset the tendency of past burns for participants to "spray and pray" their votes/tokens broadly over smaller projects? (This starves the bigger, harder to fund dreams)
If so how should that manifest?